Wednesday, September 18, 2019

The Disconnect Between Vince McMahon and Society



One of the biggest problems of modern day wrestling, at least modern WWE is the fact that they are not connecting with a broader audience the way they did in the Attitude Era and during Hulkamania. The blame is put everywhere including the talent, the writing, the booking and even the audience. All of these can contribute to a bad product but the main reason for a lack of interest in WWE is Vince McMahon being out of touch. Now a lot of people are aware of this but there are some that are not fully aware of what exactly he’s out of touch with.

First let’s look at the success of Hulkamania. Hulk Hogan was a very patriotic, family-oriented and virtuous character. This character mirrored a lot of pop culture and social conflict of the 1980s. Movies like Rambo: First Blood Part II, Die Hard, Predator and the Rocky franchise depict patriotic and strong-willed individuals facing a foreign threat. Most of Hogan’s opponents were similar characters: foreigners that seem nearly impossible to defeat. This was a direct result of the Cold War that seemingly peaked in the 80s. The Soviet threat was often seen as an inevitability and Americans were prepared for destruction. 

Having larger-than-life characters like Rocky Balboa, John Rambo, Major Dutch, John McClane and Hulk Hogan overcome these insurmountable odds extracted a feeling of pride and nationalism, a feeling perpetuated by the presidency of Ronald Reagan who was arguably one of the most nationalistic presidents in the history of the USA. Vince McMahon and the WWF did a brilliant job replicating this feeling in the wrestling product which lead to massive success and mainstream appeal. 

Now let’s move on to everybody’s favorite the Attitude Era, specifically Stone Cold Steve Austin. Austin, in the traditional sense, cannot be considered a good person. He is a reflection of the times he lived in. The 90s initiated an era of moral corruption. Events like the Rodney King trial, the LA riots and the OJ Simpson trial made the general population question the integrity of our justice system. Naturally society began to revolt and they developed a nihilistic sense of thinking. 

Nothing mattered, especially traditional values. This was adopted as the major theme in a lot of the mainstream media: movies, tv, music and of course pro wrestling. The Simpsons was a show that really defined the 90s and inspired similar shows like South Park, Family Guy and Rick and Morty. Some of the show’s main characters’ lack of morality is presented as comedy, ignoring the real personality issues. Movies like Pulp Fiction, Fight Club and Reservoir Dogs made unethical protagonists the norm, much like Steve Austin was. The mixture of society’s unrest with authority and the prevalence of moral corruption was the reason why Stone Cold Steve Austin resonated with the mainstream audience. 

The success of Hulk Hogan and Steve Austin can be mostly credited to one thing: recreating a feeling that was present within the general population. When you are able to do that the quality of the product does not really matter. Just look at both 80s and 90s WWE. When you are able to capture that feeling, the casual audience will welcome anything. Vince McMahon in 2019 is trying to recreate a feeling that is no longer the spirit of this era and that is never more apparent than with the way he pushed Roman Reigns. 

Our current times have become more complex than ever before. Economic and political issues have become more common and destructive. People feel like they are stuck in their current standing whether it be economically, socially or even personally. There is a desperation to try and move up. I’m not saying this was not present before but it is more common than before. There is also a rise of individualism. People are more focussed on how they can better themselves rather than a whole group. These two ideas go hand-in-hand. Shows like Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead and Stranger Things depict protagonists who are stuck in an unfortunate situation and have to make drastic changes to overcome it. A lot of the MCU movies present the idea of individualism. Iron Man, Thor, Captain Marvel and Black Panther all featured protagonists who were stuck in the ideas they were raised with but then developed their own thoughts and beliefs. The reason Vince McMahon cannot connect with the audience today is that he is a billionaire who does not experience economic and social distress. Often it feels like Vince not only doesn’t see the value of characters like these but also sees them as losers. A lot of his babyfaces are presented with the same level of contempt as a Roman Reigns. Wrestlers like Finn Balor and Dolph Ziggler are presented as losers for trying to change themselves and grow as competitors. Sami Zayn and Daniel Bryan are heels because they care about things. It is almost as if Vince McMahon is purposefully being a contrarian because society does not match his own values.  

You never get the feeling that Reigns has struggled the way the working class struggles. He gets awarded title matches despite not earning them and at times even after losing. His actions often go without consequence making him seem privileged and entitled. His “2kewl4skewl” attitude is really not one that resonates with even the younger audience as there is more appreciation for education in today’s society than let’s say in the 90s. He fails to accept defeat and instead of acknowledging that he needs to improve, he instead puts the blame elsewhere. In the Brock Lesnar feud he lost multiple times against Lesnar and he lost clean. He then started to blame referees and Heyman and Lesnar but was not willing to look within himself to find the real issue. He is a sore loser. He did not learn from his experiences and stuck to his old habits. The lack of growth of his character conditioned the audience that nothing will ever change with him and that it is pointless to keep watching and hold out hope that things will be different. This is why the modern audience does not get behind him. He is the antithesis of what the mainstream consumer is looking for in their protagonists.

There was a point where Vince McMahon was pushing the right man, even if it seemed accidental. Daniel Bryan started to break the barrier of the mainstream audience because he encapsulated everything that they were feeling. Bryan was stuck in the mid-card despite his great talent and fan support. This was both true in and out of storyline. He never received the title matches he felt he deserved but instead of complaining and blaming everything else, he found within himself the means to succeed in WWE. The audience noticed this and demanded he get pushed. The fact that Vince McMahon did not think that Daniel Bryan was a relatable star in these times proves that he just does not know how the audience feels. 

With the way the ratings and attendance are going for WWE, it seems like pro wrestling will never reach the heights of before. There is hope however. AEW seems like they are more in touch with what the modern audiences want. NJPW is about to reach the climax of their arc with Tetsuya Naito, who is the perfect example of what an American audience could resonate with. Too bad the exposure is not there. The people of Japan certainly care about his story and his massive popularity proves it. It can be done. Maybe WWE will realize that it is possible to have people care about protagonists and will take the right steps into making people watch again. 

New Blog

So this is a new blog for wrestling that I am starting. I used to have a wrestling blog on Tumblr but I grew tired of the site and deactivated the account. Now I will mainly post reviews here and some other pieces. I will be posting some pieces that I've written this year just to have something on this blog. I really enjoy wrestling and writing about it makes me think about in a more critical sense, which contrary to popular belief is a good thing.

I will also be posting things like match of the year, wrestler of the year, rivalry of the year etc at the end of the year.